Concern 503 · Working draft · editorial review in progress

Search-engine indexing of NCII

Search indexing can make abusive synthetic intimate images easier to discover even when the search engine did not create or host them.

Understanding the concern

A search result is a doorway to material stored elsewhere. Names, thumbnails and links can expose a person to new audiences and make abuse easier to find. Removing that doorway can reduce visibility, although it does not erase the underlying page.

Google provides a process for requesting removal of qualifying personal sexual content, including fake imagery. The distinction between search removal and host removal matters: a person should know which action has occurred and what remains. Services should also make requests possible without forcing people to repeatedly view or circulate harmful material.

An example

An abusive page stops appearing in a name search, but the hosting site still contains it.

Illustrative unless identified as a documented case.

Words in plain English

Synthetic
Made by a computer or another artificial process rather than directly recorded from the event being described.
NCII
Nonconsensual intimate imagery: intimate images shared or created without the person's agreement. Fabricated images can also cause real harm.

Evidence and its limits

This is documentation for one provider's process. Eligibility and other providers' policies differ; delisting is not whole-internet deletion.

Explore these sources in the library →
Broader frameworks and background

These resources provide context. They do not establish every claim in this concern.

A question to discuss

How should a platform explain the difference between reducing discoverability and removing the original content?

Keep track of different views, what needs checking, and any next step in your own discussion notes.

Open discussion notes →
Principles for the conversation

Before you finish · reflect together

Virtues and principles to consider

Virtues are qualities we practice in how we treat people and make choices. They are not scores for judging someone. Use these ideas to explore what a thoughtful response could look like.

Truthfulness

Truthfulness means making claims that match the evidence and being clear about what we do not know. It includes correcting mistakes rather than protecting a polished story.

Check sources, label guesses, and distinguish a trial result from a proven benefit. If AI helped produce a claim, someone still needs to take responsibility for checking it.

Ask together: What can we honestly say, and what still needs checking?

Meaningful conversation

Conversation means making room to understand and be understood. It is more than winning a debate or collecting quick agreement. People can explore a question together without starting from the same view.

Use a concrete example, invite different experiences, and ask what might change each person's mind. Let concerns and hopes sit together long enough to reveal choices that a simple yes-or-no argument would miss.

Ask together: What can we learn from each other before deciding?

Unity

Unity means working toward shared purposes while making room for real differences. It does not require everyone to have the same experience, beliefs, or opinion.

Look for a goal people can share, then explore disagreements about how to reach it. Make sure quieter or less powerful voices can influence the result.

Ask together: What purpose can we share while respecting our differences?

Editorial ratings

These are editorial judgments from the register, not measured probabilities or predictions about your situation.

Severity
Major · 4/5
Likelihood
Documented at scale · 5/5
Time horizon
Now
Register risk score
20
About the register and scoring →
More ways to explore

Search for more writing

For more specific or recent material, open a search below or ask for a web summary. AI-generated summaries can contain mistakes; open the original articles to check them.

Explore a proposed use of AI →