Explore concerns and questions for clinics, homes, and communities.

Health, wellness & care

Questions about AI in health and care.

Explore concerns in the clinic, at home, and in the community. Each section offers questions, related concerns, and a discussion guide.

Patients & families
Care teams
Safer decisions
Keep people at the center of AI in care
Named in care
41
Scored 20–25
15
Clinical AI
24
All concerns
1000

Composite score · Health, Safety & Care

Most of what we named is already serious. Two sit at the top of the scale.

  • 25 · irreversible & common · 2
  • 20 · 13
  • 16 · 24
  • 15 and under · 2

Three rooms, one ecosystem

The clinic

A wrong score can harm a patient.

Triage, imaging, notes, prescribing, a robot at the table. The problem is not that AI is here. It is that it can be here without being named, checked, or owned.

  • Who was this tested on, and do they look like the people we serve?
  • What must remain a human judgement even if the model is faster?
  • If this is wrong, is it a delay or an irreversible harm — and who is named?

The household

Companions, elders, children, a wellness app in the pocket.

Care does not only happen in a hospital. A chatbot at 2 a.m., a parent negotiating a school tool, an elder with a device that talks back: that is health too.

  • When is this a tool, and when is it being asked to be a friend?
  • Does the person understand what is listening, and can they refuse?
  • What would I need to know before I let this sit with a child, or with someone I love who is fading?

The community

Public health, school screening, the air and water models.

A town does not buy most of the systems it lives under. It still has to ask who is scored, who is missed, and who may refuse.

  • Who is flagged, who is missed, and who owns the record that follows?
  • What would public accountability look like for a tool we did not purchase?
  • How do we speak about benefit without hiding who is left out of the training set?

Borrowed from MIT · Causal taxonomy

Three questions that turn a worry into a sentence.

MIT asks of every risk: who set it in motion, whether it was on purpose, and when it arose. Tap a column. The example is from care, home, or community — not from a lab.

Who set it in motion?

MIT calls this entity.

Was it on purpose?

MIT calls this intent.

When did it arise?

MIT calls this timing.

A person · By accident · Once people were using it

In the clinic

A scribe no one has time to check

An ambient note-taker is switched on to save minutes. The clinician is still responsible for the record. In a full clinic, review thins out. A fabricated symptom enters a chart.

See this on MIT's own page

Three questions that turn a worry into a sentence: who set it going, whether it was on purpose, and when. Walked with cases from care. Use them in a huddle. The sources page holds the denser maps when you need them.