II · D12 · 12.3
AI companions and adolescent development
Sensitive-window disruption.
Major · 4Documented at scaleNowRisk 20
Severity
4/5
Likelihood
5/5
In the hierarchy
- Part II: Societal & Human Concerns
- D12. Human–Computer Interaction Harms
- 12.3 Youth-specific harms
Virtues and principles to explore
Held as inquiry, not as a verdict.
Dignity
Center principle
Every person is a protagonist, not a data point.
Listening
Trust
Listen to understand, rather than listen to speak.
Seeing potential
Hope
Ask what people could become with these tools, not whom they replace.
Starter questions
Written to probe curiosity and learning, not accusation.
- 01What might we be missing if we treat “AI companions and adolescent development” only as a technical problem?
- 02If a colleague raised this concern tomorrow, how would we receive it as inquiry rather than accusation?
- 03What capacity would we need — in people, in the institution, in the tools — to meet this well?
- 04What would Seeing potential require of us here, before we proceed?
Also on this branch
Frameworks and sources
- NIST AI 600-1 Generative AI Profileframework
Writing and incidents
Open indexes first. Then, if you wish, ask Grok to search the live web for this concern — one request, cached for the rest of this session.
What happens between a person and a system: overreliance, loneliness, lost judgement.