Map/D12/12.2

II · D12 · 12.2

AI romantic partners

Replika-style relationships displacing human ones.

Serious · 3Widely observedNowRisk 12

Severity

3/5

Likelihood

4/5

In the hierarchy

  1. Part II: Societal & Human Concerns
  2. D12. Human–Computer Interaction Harms
  3. 12.2 Anthropomorphism, companionship & attachment

Virtues and principles to explore

Held as inquiry, not as a verdict.

  • Dignity

    Center principle

    Every person is a protagonist, not a data point.

  • Listening

    Trust

    Listen to understand, rather than listen to speak.

  • Seeing potential

    Hope

    Ask what people could become with these tools, not whom they replace.

Starter questions

Written to probe curiosity and learning, not accusation.

  1. 01If a colleague raised this concern tomorrow, how would we receive it as inquiry rather than accusation?
  2. 02What capacity would we need — in people, in the institution, in the tools — to meet this well?
  3. 03What would Seeing potential require of us here, before we proceed?
  4. 04What might we be missing if we treat “AI romantic partners” only as a technical problem?

Also on this branch

Frameworks and sources

Writing and incidents

Open indexes first. Then, if you wish, ask Grok to search the live web for this concern — one request, cached for the rest of this session.

What happens between a person and a system: overreliance, loneliness, lost judgement.