III · D18 · 18.3
Bletchley/Seoul/Paris declarations
Non-binding but norm-setting.
Serious · 3Widely observedNowRisk 12
Severity
3/5
Likelihood
4/5
In the hierarchy
- Part III: Governance, Power & Existential Concerns
- D18. Governance & Regulation
- 18.3 International coordination
Virtues and principles to explore
Held as inquiry, not as a verdict.
Accountability
Trust
Name who holds the consequence before it is needed.
Prudence
Excellence
Small, reversible steps before irreversible ones.
Unity
Unity
Many perspectives, one shared picture.
Starter questions
Written to probe curiosity and learning, not accusation.
- 01If a colleague raised this concern tomorrow, how would we receive it as inquiry rather than accusation?
- 02What capacity would we need — in people, in the institution, in the tools — to meet this well?
- 03What would Unity require of us here, before we proceed?
- 04What might we be missing if we treat “Bletchley/Seoul/Paris declarations” only as a technical problem?
Also on this branch
Frameworks and sources
- EU AI Act — high-level summaryregulation
- NIST AI RMFframework
- ISO/IEC 42001standard
Writing and incidents
Open indexes first. Then, if you wish, ask Grok to search the live web for this concern — one request, cached for the rest of this session.
The rules, forums, and public bodies trying to keep pace.