The evidence behind the guides
Sources Find a study, check what it supports, and follow it back to a concern.
TopicAll topics Data Integrity & Provenance Model Performance & Reliability Security & Adversarial Risk Transparency, Explainability & Accountability Agentic & Multi-Agent Risks Infrastructure, Compute & Deployment Environmental & Physical Footprint Discrimination, Fairness & Toxicity Privacy & Surveillance Misinformation, Manipulation & Democracy Malicious Use & Weaponization Human–Computer Interaction Harms Health, Safety & Care Labor, Work & the Economy Education & Knowledge Inequality, Access & Power Culture, Identity & Values Governance & Regulation Rights, Law & Justice Corporate & Enterprise Concerns Power Concentration & Geopolitics AI System Safety & Alignment Catastrophic & Existential Risk CollectionAll sources Cited in concern guides Topic reading Research tools & guidance
Sources for Fine-tune opacity Show all concerns 2 sources
Guide citations are still under editorial review. Qi and colleagues · Research study
Tests safety changes under both malicious and benign customization; accidental weakening is distinct from intentional poisoning.
Evidence notes & 2 linked concerns + Mitchell and colleagues · FAT* 2019 · Research proposal
Proposes documentation of intended use, evaluation conditions and performance; a card's existence is not proof of quality.
Evidence notes & 2 linked concerns +