Concern 370 · Working draft · editorial review in progress

CSAM generation

AI-generated child sexual abuse material is abusive sexual imagery of children created or altered using AI.

Understanding the concern

The fact that an image is synthetic does not make the harm unreal. Such material can exploit a real child's likeness, circulate alongside records of actual abuse and create further burdens for victims and investigators. The Internet Watch Foundation has documented this material in the reports it assesses.

This topic can be explained without showing the material or describing how to create it. Prevention involves the design of generation tools, hosting and reporting systems, and specialist child-protection work. Monitoring figures describe what an organisation found within its work; they are not a complete count of everything online or proof that every generator permits abuse.

An example

A child's ordinary photograph is misused to create abusive synthetic imagery.

Illustrative unless identified as a documented case.

Words in plain English

AI
Software that learns patterns from examples or uses rules to perform tasks such as recognizing images or generating text. It can make mistakes and does not understand every situation as a person would.
Synthetic
Made by a computer or another artificial process rather than directly recorded from the event being described.
CSAM
Child sexual abuse material. AI-generated abusive material can also harm children and requires protective responses.

Evidence and its limits

IWF provides direct monitoring evidence. Its assessed reports are not a representative census of all online material, and laws differ by jurisdiction.

Explore these sources in the library →
Broader frameworks and background

These resources provide context. They do not establish every claim in this concern.

A question to discuss

How do services prevent this misuse and support rapid, specialist handling of reports involving children?

Keep track of different views, what needs checking, and any next step in your own discussion notes.

Open discussion notes →
Principles for the conversation

Before you finish · reflect together

Virtues and principles to consider

Virtues are qualities we practice in how we treat people and make choices. They are not scores for judging someone. Use these ideas to explore what a thoughtful response could look like.

Justice

Justice means fair treatment, fair procedures, and attention to who receives benefits and burdens. It asks whether people with less power can be heard and seek repair.

Look at outcomes across different groups and individual cases. Provide a usable way to challenge decisions and correct harm. Equal wording in a policy does not guarantee equal treatment in practice.

Ask together: Who benefits, who bears the cost, and who can challenge the decision?

Dignity

Dignity means recognizing each person's worth regardless of usefulness, status, or a system's score. People deserve respect and a voice in matters that affect them.

Explain important decisions, avoid humiliating treatment, and keep room for a person's story. Do not treat a prediction as a complete account of who someone is.

Ask together: Does this use treat each person as someone whose experience matters?

Listening

Listening means trying to understand someone's experience before preparing an answer. People who use a service, work with it, or are judged by it may notice problems its designers miss.

Invite people to describe what happened in their own words. Repeat back what you understood and let them correct it. A quiet person or a complaint that is hard to measure may still reveal something important.

Ask together: Whose experience have we not heard yet?

Editorial ratings

These are editorial judgments from the register, not measured probabilities or predictions about your situation.

Severity
Catastrophic · 5/5
Likelihood
Documented at scale · 5/5
Time horizon
Now
Register risk score
25
About the register and scoring →
More ways to explore

Search for more writing

For more specific or recent material, open a search below or ask for a web summary. AI-generated summaries can contain mistakes; open the original articles to check them.

Explore a proposed use of AI →