III · D18 · 18.2
Prohibited practices
Social scoring, real-time public biometric ID (with exceptions), manipulative subliminal AI.
Serious · 3Widely observedNowRisk 12
Severity
3/5
Likelihood
4/5
In the hierarchy
- Part III: Governance, Power & Existential Concerns
- D18. Governance & Regulation
- 18.2 Risk-tier & assurance regimes
Virtues and principles to explore
Held as inquiry, not as a verdict.
Accountability
Trust
Name who holds the consequence before it is needed.
Prudence
Excellence
Small, reversible steps before irreversible ones.
Unity
Unity
Many perspectives, one shared picture.
Starter questions
Written to probe curiosity and learning, not accusation.
- 01What would trustworthiness look like here: what we do, what we say, and the belief others form?
- 02What would it look like if we held “Prohibited practices” with proportion rather than alarm?
- 03If we named this complication in advance, what small, reversible step would let us learn?
- 04How would we know we were getting this wrong? What would we observe, without blaming a person?
Also on this branch
Frameworks and sources
- EU AI Act — high-level summaryregulation
- NIST AI RMFframework
- ISO/IEC 42001standard
Writing and incidents
Open indexes first. Then, if you wish, ask Grok to search the live web for this concern — one request, cached for the rest of this session.
The rules, forums, and public bodies trying to keep pace.