Concern 817 · Working draft · editorial review in progress

Conformity assessments

A conformity assessment checks whether a covered AI system meets specified legal requirements before use or sale; the concern is whether the assessment is meaningful and appropriate to the system.

Understanding the concern

An assessment may examine documentation, risk controls, data practices and testing. Depending on the legal route, parts can be performed internally or require an outside body. The process is therefore not always an independent government test of each model or each answer it produces.

The EU framework provides different assessment routes for different systems. Think of inspecting a building before opening: the inspection concerns defined requirements and the intended use, not every future event. A substantial change can affect whether the earlier assessment still applies. People need clarity about who assessed the system, what evidence was considered and what the result covers.

An example

A product advertises that it passed an assessment, but the assessed version differs from the one now making decisions.

Illustrative unless identified as a documented case.

Words in plain English

AI
Software that learns patterns from examples or uses rules to perform tasks such as recognizing images or generating text. It can make mistakes and does not understand every situation as a person would.
Model
The learned part of an AI system. It uses patterns found during training to produce an answer or prediction.
EU
The European Union, a group of European countries with shared institutions and some shared laws.

Evidence and its limits

Assessment routes and dates vary. This explanation is not a claim that all high-risk AI requires the same third-party certification.

Explore these sources in the library →
Broader frameworks and background

These resources provide context. They do not establish every claim in this concern.

A question to discuss

Which version and intended use were assessed, and how are later changes handled?

Keep track of different views, what needs checking, and any next step in your own discussion notes.

Open discussion notes →
Principles for the conversation

Before you finish · reflect together

Virtues and principles to consider

Virtues are qualities we practice in how we treat people and make choices. They are not scores for judging someone. Use these ideas to explore what a thoughtful response could look like.

Accountability

Accountability means being answerable for decisions and taking responsibility for repair. It requires more than saying that the software made the choice.

Name the person or team responsible, keep useful records, and give them authority to correct problems. Make the route to a complaint clear to the people affected.

Ask together: Who will answer for the outcome and help put things right?

Prudence

Prudence means using careful judgment before and during action. It balances worthwhile opportunities with the need to avoid harm that could have been anticipated.

Start with a limited trial, set stopping points, and prefer choices that can be undone when uncertainty is high. Review what happens rather than assuming the original plan remains sound.

Ask together: What is a careful next step, and when should we stop or change course?

Unity

Unity means working toward shared purposes while making room for real differences. It does not require everyone to have the same experience, beliefs, or opinion.

Look for a goal people can share, then explore disagreements about how to reach it. Make sure quieter or less powerful voices can influence the result.

Ask together: What purpose can we share while respecting our differences?

Editorial ratings

These are editorial judgments from the register, not measured probabilities or predictions about your situation.

Severity
Serious · 3/5
Likelihood
Widely observed · 4/5
Time horizon
Now
Register risk score
12
About the register and scoring →
More ways to explore

Search for more writing

For more specific or recent material, open a search below or ask for a web summary. AI-generated summaries can contain mistakes; open the original articles to check them.

Explore a proposed use of AI →