Ask
Say who you are and what is in front of you. You will get questions to take to a visit, a huddle, a pitch, or a kitchen table.
A scoring error here becomes a body. The job is still the same: name the complication, prepare, proceed with care.
For I am a doctor, nurse, or clinician
Opening
How do we honour their work without letting a fluent answer replace a clinical one?
What did they ask it, and what did it sound sure about?
What would it look like to walk through the claim together, without humiliation?
Where is the tool useful as a draft, and where is it unsafe as a verdict?
What do we owe families who cannot afford a second opinion except this?
Same questions, denser rooms. Go when you are ready — not as a test of seriousness.
Health-specific guidance
World Health Organization
WHO's 2024 guidance on large multimodal models in health: consent, evidence, equity, and the duties that remain with clinicians and states.
The question is not 'is AI risky?' but 'what does care require of this tool?'
How / when / why
MIT AI Risk Initiative
Three questions of every risk: which entity (a person, the system, or unclear); whether it was intentional; and whether it arose before deployment or after people were already using it.
A conversation is stuck on 'AI is dangerous' and needs a sentence instead of a mood.